THE GREAT INDIAN DEBATE — DAY 51 Is India’s growth story real for the bottom half?
THE STAKES Last month, the National Sample Survey Office released its latest consumption expenditure data, showing that the average monthly spending of the poorest 5% of Indians rose from ₹1,307 in 2011-12 to ₹1,782 in 2022-23—a 36% increase in real terms. At the same time, the top 5% saw their spending jump by 62%. The data reignited a bitter debate: Is India’s economic growth trickling down, or is it leaving the poor behind? The question isn’t just academic. It shapes whether the government doubles down on welfare schemes like PM-Kisan or shifts focus to infrastructure and manufacturing. And it determines whether the next generation of rural Indians sees migration to cities as an opportunity or a trap.
THE ARGUMENT FOR Those who argue that India’s growth is reaching the bottom half point to hard data. Poverty rates have plummeted: the World Bank estimates that extreme poverty (living on less than $2.15 a day) fell from 22.5% in 2011 to just 10% in 2019. The government’s own figures show that 250 million people have been lifted out of multidimensional poverty since 2015, thanks to schemes like Ujjwala (free cooking gas), Jal Jeevan (tap water), and PM-Awas (housing). Economist Surjit Bhalla argues that this is the fastest poverty reduction in history, driven by a combination of growth and targeted welfare.
Proponents also highlight structural changes. Rural wages have grown faster than urban wages in the last decade, and the share of agriculture in GDP has fallen from 18% to 15%, even as farm incomes have risen. The spread of mobile internet and Aadhaar-enabled payments has reduced leakages in welfare, ensuring that benefits reach the intended recipients. The argument isn’t that inequality has disappeared, but that growth is no longer confined to the top 10%. As NITI Aayog CEO B.V.R. Subrahmanyam puts it, “The poor are not just spectators to India’s growth—they are active participants.”
THE ARGUMENT AGAINST Critics counter that the headline numbers mask deep distress. While poverty rates have fallen, the quality of that escape is questionable. The consumption data shows that the poorest 20% spend 45% of their income on food—up from 40% a decade ago—suggesting that non-food essentials like healthcare and education are becoming unaffordable. Economist Jean Drèze points out that real wages for casual labourers have stagnated since 2019, and the unemployment rate for rural youth is at a 45-year high. “Growth without jobs is a mirage for the poor,” he argues.
The welfare state, while expansive, is also fragile. Schemes like PM-Kisan (₹6,000 a year for farmers) are too small to lift families out of poverty, and their coverage is patchy. A 2023 study by the Centre for Sustainable Employment found that 40% of eligible households were excluded from at least one major welfare scheme. Meanwhile, the informal sector—where 85% of India’s workforce toils—has seen no real wage growth since demonetisation. The argument isn’t that nothing has improved, but that the improvements are too slow, too uneven, and too dependent on precarious gig work. As economist Jayati Ghosh puts it, “India’s growth is like a train where the poor are allowed to board, but only in the unreserved compartment.”
THE HIDDEN DIMENSION Most debates on this topic ignore the elephant in the room: land. India’s growth model since the 1990s has relied on shifting labour from low-productivity agriculture to higher-productivity manufacturing and services. But this transition requires land—either for factories, highways, or urban expansion. The problem? The bottom half of India doesn’t just work on land; they own it. Small and marginal farmers (who make up 86% of all landholders) control 47% of India’s cultivated area. When growth demands land, it’s their plots that get acquired, often at below-market rates, leaving them with cash but no livelihood.
This is why protests like the 2020-21 farmers’ agitation weren’t just about farm laws—they were about the fear of dispossession. The hidden dimension is that India’s growth story for the bottom half is inseparable from the question of land rights. If the state can’t guarantee fair compensation or alternative employment, growth will always feel like a threat, not an opportunity. And with climate change making agriculture even more precarious, this tension will only sharpen.
WHERE INDIANS STAND A 2023 Lokniti-CSDS survey found that 52% of Indians believe the country’s economic growth has benefited “only the rich,” while 38% say it has helped “all sections.” The divide is stark along class lines: 68% of the poorest respondents felt left out, compared to 34% of the richest. Interestingly, rural Indians were slightly more optimistic than urban ones, possibly because of welfare schemes. But the overall sentiment is clear: most Indians don’t feel like they’re part of the growth story.
YOUR VIEW If growth hasn’t reached the bottom half, is the solution more welfare or more jobs—and can India afford both?
This newsletter aims to clarify genuine arguments on complex issues. It does not endorse any political position or party.